JEREMY Y WANG

a grad student's thoughts on mind, brain, education and science
Jan 26

Prezi: How can we measure teaching and learning in mathematics?

This presentation by Maria Anderson (Muskegon Community College) is a great introduction to approaches educational researchers take to measure teaching and learning in mathematics. (More comments after the jump...)

           

One thing to keep in mind is that each of the measurement tools mentioned is intended to measure a different aspect of learning. Learning is complex and involves things like conceptual understanding, dispositions towards things like learning and studying, classroom environment, teachers' beliefs about learning, etc. One tool (for example, a standardized test) is not going to capture everything there is to know about what goes on in schools. That said, this presentation does a great job of describing the set of tools that researchers have available to them to capture what we think is involved in learning.

Also, if you haven't tried out PREZI before, take it for a spin. As a bonus, they just added an Educational License, so if you are a student or a teacher, you can get special rates. You might just abandon PowerPoint forever...
Jan 4

NY Times: The Case of the Vanishing Full-Time Professor

Illustrations by Chis Gash

If you’ve written a few five-figure tuition checks or taken on 10 years’ of debt, you probably think you’re paying to be taught by full-time professors. But it’s entirely possible that most of your teachers are freelancers.

In 1960, 75 percent of college instructors were full-time tenured or tenure-track professors; today only 27 percent are. The rest are graduate students or adjunct and contingent faculty — instructors employed on a per-course or yearly contract basis, usually without benefits and earning a third or less of what their tenured colleagues make. The recession means their numbers are growing.

“When a tenure-track position is empty,” says Gwendolyn Bradley, director of communications at the American Association of University Professors, “institutions are choosing to hire three part-timers to save money.”

THE PROBLEM

While many adjuncts are talented teachers with the same degrees as tenured professors, they’re treated as second-class citizens on most campuses, and that affects students.

It’s sometimes harder to track down adjuncts outside of class, because they rarely have offices or even their own departmental mailboxes.

Many patch together jobs at different colleges to make ends meet, and with commuting, there’s less time to confer with students or prepare for class. It’s not unusual for adjuncts to be hired at the last minute to teach courses they’ve never taught. And with no job security, they may consider it advantageous to tailor classes for student approval.

HOW TO

Colleges tend to play down the increasingly central role of adjuncts. This fall, the American Federation of Teachers complained that some top-ranked universities exaggerated the percentage of full-time faculty to U.S. News & World Report for its rankings. U.S. News declined to investigate.

Another source is the “Compare Higher Education Institutions” search tool at A.F.T.’s Higher Education Data Center (highereddata.aft.org). These are the stats that colleges report to the federal government.

Ask admissions officers point-blank: what percentage of classes and discussion sections are taught by part-timers and graduate assistants, and are they required to hold office hours?

For entry-level classes — the ones tenured faculty famously don’t want to teach — the squeaky wheel often gets a full-time professor, says Harlan Cohen, author of “The Naked Roommate: And 107 Other Issues You Might Run Into in College.” “If you’re not thrilled with your adjunct professor,” he says, “go to the head of the department and see what options are available. They may put you in a different section.”

CAVEATS

If you take a strict anti-adjunct stance, you may miss out on some star instructors — Barack Obama taught a seminar on racism and the law at the University of Chicago Law School as an adjunct. Professoring part-time is a hobby for overachieving architects, graphic designers, lawyers and entrepreneurs, all of whom can share insights from real-world experiences that full-time academics haven’t had.

“Before making assumptions that an adjunct is bad, Google them,” Mr. Cohen says. “You may find that real estate teacher is one step removed from Donald Trump’s V.P. on LinkedIn, and these are the types of people you want to meet.”

Two views on this:

(1) My girlfriend is one of those adjunct faculty that take teaching seriously, probably more so than most full-time faculty, and students benefit from that. However, this is a blessing and a curse for her - she can do freelance, but doesn't get benefits.

(2) If this is the direction we're heading, we might end up with two types of faculty - those that research and those that teach. Again, a blessing and a curse - teaching requires a lot of effort that some researchers aren't willing to put in, but researchers are at the forefront of human knowledge that students should have access to...

Oct 2

Paradigms and Programs for Research in Teaching

Picture_7

 

I'm currently taking a class with Misti Sato entitled "Teaching Theory and Research" (along with 4 other courses and 3 research projects, ugh). One of this week's readings was a Lee Shulman piece that has really helped me conceptualize my research priorities (citation below).

My training straddles two departments: Curriculum & Instruction and Educational Psychology. The research paradigms/agendas in each take different approaches to educational research and I've been struggling to choose between (or bridge) them. Here, Shulman's thinking (while always extremely lucid) is quite helpful, even more than 20 years removed from the original publishing.

The synoptic model that he uses to describe research programs has allowed me to do two things: (1) determine where in the "world" of research on teaching my interests lie, and (2) see what other aspects of teaching research I can consider (or ignore).

My interests really lie in what Shulman calls the "Student Mediation" research paradigm. With ideological roots in cognitive and social psychology, this approach is concerned with how and why students learn from the curriculum and instruction presented to them. On this model, it focuses on how students' thoughts and feelings are related to teacher actions and students' subsequent behavior and capacities. My interests in particular are about how students make sense of science curriculum and instruction, how aspects of science content and reasoning interact with this sense-making, and how we can measure the capacities that we intend to teach to students.

I've been rather fortunate in my graduate school selection to have Keisha and Sashank Varma come to the University of Minnesota the same year as me. Their research interests are greatly shapin how I think about my own career and what is possible in this field.

I'd highly recommend this article to anyone in the field of educational research, especially if, like me, you are still trying to grasp what your research is really about.

 

 

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. Handbook of research on teaching, 3, 3–36. 

Get Updates

Tags

Archive

2012 (10)
2011 (8)
2010 (33)
2009 (43)